*
VS
*
Which cartridge....1. Package a exceptional punch/KE.2. Deals an ext damage come tissues.3. Has superior penetration.4. Is more accurate.5. Is more cost effective.6. Which should you buy, a .50 Cal to be Rifle or a .700 NE searching Rifle.

You are watching: .700 nitro express vs .50 bmg


*

Which cartridge....1. Package a remarkable punch/KE.2. Deals an ext damage come tissues.3. Has superior penetration.4. Is an ext accurate.5. Is an ext cost effective.6. Which must you buy, a .50 Cal to be Rifle or a .700 NE hunting Rifle.
1. The .50 BMG is significantly an ext powerful.2. They"re both an ext than qualified of putting large holes in anything they hit.3. More than likely .50 BMG because of its better power and small cross section. That offers it much better sectional density. The .50 BMG is also a spitzer round.4. The .50 BMG should be much more accurate because of being a greater velocity spitzer round.5. A cheap .700 Nitro refer rifle is $10,000 and also cheap ammunition is $50 per cartridge. The is more than military and police great .50 BMG rifles and ammunition.6. Unless you are hunting elephants or have a many money to spend on showpieces the .50 BMG is much more practical.
.50BMG is cheaper, much more powerful, and has more penetration..700 nitro to express is a showoff round, for hunting.
*

Reminds me of my botchered novel the I"m working on a couple of years ago...The powered Exoskeleton operator in the protagonist"s offhanded usually have a .700 NE revolver as back-up weapon.The revolvers fires one of two people a shot-shell or a THV round.

I doubt you deserve to reliably compare the two because they"re in two various niches and also are designed to fufill various roles. Specifically in a army sense since .50 BMG is going come be far better designed in state of military roles (range, penetration, etc.) It"s more than likely going to be BMG because that "cost effectiveness" and much more accurate.The remainder of that is largely contextual (and duplicating roles anyhow) because terminal results cover "damage in tissues" and also "penetration" (penetration is crucial to identify lethality, not just in bypassing armor yet in passing through structures and body depth - particularly without gift deflected or otherwise degraded in the procedure of penetration) and also KE is going to be concerned that because work is going come be excellent (what you treatment about much more is job-related anyhow, not the total energy which merely represents the potential to do work. And work will be shame as much by projectile style and duty as the "KE".)
ThatZenoGuyResidential Zealous progressed Nano Organism
Banned
Connor MacLeod said:
I doubt you have the right to reliably to compare the two since they"re in two various niches and also are designed to fufill various roles. Specifically in a armed forces sense since .50 BMG is going come be far better designed in state of armed forces roles (range, penetration, etc.) It"s probably going to it is in BMG because that "cost effectiveness" and more accurate.The rest of that is largely contextual (and duplicating duties anyhow) due to the fact that terminal impacts cover "damage in tissues" and also "penetration" (penetration is vital to determining lethality, not only in bypassing armor however in passing through structures and body depth - particularly without being deflected or otherwise degraded in the procedure of penetration) and also KE is going come be related to that since work is going to be done (what you treatment about much more is job-related anyhow, no the total energy which just represents the potential to do work. And work will certainly be shame as lot by projectile design and duty as the "KE".)
Could the be suggested that for literally any terrestrial organism, .700 is more than enough? i mean, just whales have enough thickness to withstand that monster, right?
*

Ones a quick range big game round arisen from black powder rounds of similar ilk hence the nitro refer tagThe rather a armed forces HMG round also extreme long variety rifle round totally different niches.

Connor MacLeodYes.
Staff
ThatZenoGuy said:
Could it be argued that for literally any terrestrial organism, .700 is much more than enough? i mean, only whales have sufficient thickness to stand up to that monster, right?
No, because it counts on how the bullet interacts v the target tissues and also there"s constantly a possibility of overpenetration (of the target, of the bordering buildings...) I have actually no idea if 700 nitro has any sort the ballistic experimentation done, however even if the did the wouldn"t equate well between differnt creatures as humans can have diffrent organization compositions/qualities 보다 many animals (like deer) - one factor why pigs were so extremely prized as "live-fire" test subjects due to the fact that they closely correlate to animals.(ballistic gelatin is already an approximation of person tissue at best, for this reason is going come be also less well suited to animal comparisons, and also vice versa. One factor why girlfriend should constantly be cautious of ballistig gelatin "showings" online since the simulant is expected to be offered in really specific method of comparing tools effects and the an ext you stray from that the less reliable things get.)You literally deserve to have "too powerful" once it involves firearms because that a specific, plan purpose. And also like all tools (especially in a military context) the energy is defined by the to plan role(s) that is intended to occupy.
Ian Hogg in "Tank Killing" make cite that in between the wars a british sporting eight manufatorer comprised one or two sporting twin barrelled guns in .50 BMG (or maybe .50 Vickers)...
RubberanvilHentai Undivided
Most most likely the .50 Vickers, the british didn"t adopt the .50 BMG till after Lend-lease.

See more: 420 Montgomery Street San Francisco Ca 94104, Wells Fargo Private Bank


Delta Force
As an exciting historical point, the British army actually did usage Nitro express rifles to penetrate metal shields during human being War ns (source).